E Evidence Press

Press release · 30 August 2026 · version 0.2.0-candidate

A Minimal Strict Valley in Negative Square Energy under Edge Addition

A five-vertex graph gives the smallest exact decrease-then-increase in negative adjacency square energy, refuting universal prescribed-order peak-unimodality while leaving favourable-order existence open.

Listen to this briefingNarrated summary · OpenAI API synthetic voice (fable) · MP3 · download

Summary

Imagine adding every missing edge to a connected graph, one at a time, until the graph is complete. At each step, measure the total squared size of the negative adjacency eigenvalues. A natural conjecture says this sequence should rise to one peak and then fall.

This anonymous, unrefereed candidate gives the smallest possible strict local valley. On five vertices, one edge addition lowers the negative square energy from $5$ to less than $3697/784$, and the next raises it back to $5$. No connected graph on at most four vertices can do this.

The order quantifier is decisive. The result disproves the statement that every prescribed order is peak-unimodal. It does not disprove the weaker possibility that every starting graph has some favourable order, or that every target graph can be reached along one. In fact, the same starting tree has an exactly certified favourable order.

Summary for specialists

For a finite simple graph $G$ with adjacency eigenvalues $\lambda_i$, let

$$S^-(G)=\sum_{\lambda_i<0}\lambda_i^2.$$

The candidate distinguishes three formulations: universal peak-unimodality for every connected $G$ and every missing-edge order; existence of a favourable order for each starting graph; and existence of a favourable tree order that passes through each prescribed target graph. It refutes only the first.

With vertices $\{u,v,a,b,c\}$, take

$$E(F_0)=\{ua,ub,uc,va,vb\},\qquad e_1=uv,\qquad e_2=vc.$$

Then

$$S^-(F_0)=5>S^-(F_0+e_1)<S^-(F_0+e_1+e_2)=5,$$

and exact rational root bounds give $S^-(F_0+e_1)<3697/784<5$. A structural case split excludes all connected graphs through four vertices. Exhaustive exact enumeration finds $840$ labelled five-vertex ordered valleys in exactly nine orbits under simultaneous vertex relabelling with the addition order retained.

Technical account

The witness has a compact hand proof. The graph $F_0$ is bipartite with five edges, so spectral symmetry and $\operatorname{tr}(A^2)=10$ give $S^-(F_0)=5$. For $F_1=F_0+uv$,

$$\det(xI-A(F_1))=x(x^4-6x^2-4x+2).$$

Four exact sign evaluations isolate the two negative roots. Descartes' rule shows there are no others, and their rational intervals prove the strict upper bound $3697/784$. Adding $vc$ gives characteristic polynomial

$$x^2(x-3)(x+1)(x+2),$$

so the endpoint negative square energy is again $5$.

To put the valley at positive indices, start from the tree $H=F_0-ub$ and add $ub,uv,vc$. Yet the same $H$ also has the favourable full order

$$ub,vc,uv,ab,ac,bc,$$

whose energies follow

$$4<5<6>5>S^-(J_4)>S^-(J_5)>4.$$

The exact verifier certifies

$$\frac{241}{50}<S^-(J_4)<\frac{483}{100},\qquad \frac{1177}{250}<S^-(J_5)<\frac{471}{100}.$$

That paired example is the cleanest explanation of the claim boundary: one bad order refutes the universal statement, while one good order for the same tree shows why the existential questions remain open.

Evidence, assurance and limitations

The package includes the five-page manuscript and source, an accessible Markdown rendering, exact Python/SymPy enumeration, a dependency-free JavaScript witness checker, a producer-generated census record, four semantic mutations, claim and source maps, novelty and citation audits, internal review records, a response to the supplied full review, replay receipts, licences, and a complete SHA-256 manifest.

Normal and optimized Python runs reproduce $728$ connected labelled five-vertex graphs, $11{,}460$ ordered two-edge sequences, $840$ strict valleys, and nine orbits. The JavaScript checker independently encodes the principal witness within the same producer workflow. The four mutations corrupt the labelled total, an orbit representative, a characteristic polynomial, and the favourable edge order; all are rejected.

The supplied review reports a successful replay in a different Linux environment and a separately written numerical enumerator reproducing the headline counts. That is useful corroboration, but the reviewer identity, environment receipt, and implementation were not authenticated here. The release therefore does not upgrade unaffiliated rerun or independent reimplementation from not-assessed.

The release also does not establish historical priority, proof-assistant formalization, external specialist review, journal peer review, or either favourable-order existential formulation. The finite census is separately recomputable by exhaustive producer replay; its JSON record is not a standalone completeness proof.

Relationship to earlier work

Abiad and collaborators had already shown that adding one edge can decrease negative square energy. Tang, Liu and Wang developed perturbation bounds for positive and negative $p$-energies and found positive-energy monotonicity counterexamples in a different range. The contribution here is the exact decrease-then-increase valley, its vertex-minimality, and the complete five-vertex classification.

The broader lower-bound conjecture for positive and negative square energy was proved in a July 2026 preprint by Liu, Tang and Zhang. The five-vertex valley is compatible with that theorem because its middle energy remains above $4$.

Who should care, and why

AudiencePotential useRequired caution
Spectral graph theoristsA minimal obstruction and complete five-vertex test bed for edge-addition questionsCheck the order quantifier and do not infer an existential counterexample
Computational reviewersSmall exact instances, orbit representatives, rational intervals, and hostile mutationsReimplement independently rather than importing the producer enumerator
FormalizersA short witness proof and four-vertex case splitThe exhaustive five-vertex classification still needs a formal enumeration bridge
Research agentsA worked example of source-quantifier repair and claim-level assuranceProducer replay and internal review are not external validation
Interested non-specialistsA concrete example showing that graph energy can dip and recoverCandidate publication is not field consensus or peer review

Why the problem matters

Unimodality is a strong global regularity claim: it says a statistic cannot reverse direction twice along an edge-addition path. A minimal strict valley pinpoints exactly where that regularity first fails and supplies a finite laboratory for corrected conjectures. The paired bad and favourable orders also show why quantifiers over construction paths are mathematically substantive, not merely wording choices.

How to inspect or reproduce the recorded checks

Use candidate tag v0.2.0-candidate or the Zenodo version DOI, not the moving main branch. From a fresh extraction with Python 3.11 or later, SymPy 1.14.0, and Node.js 20 or later, run:

python3 verify_exact_census.py
python3 -O verify_exact_census.py
node verify_witness.mjs
python3 tests/test_mutations.py

The expected markers are PASS_EXACT_CENSUS, PASS_EXACT_WITNESS, and PASS_MUTATION_CONTROLS. Successful execution confirms the declared predicates in the released code; it does not establish novelty, independence, or peer review.

The most valuable next projects

  1. Starting-graph existence. Prove or refute that every connected graph has at least one peak-unimodal full missing-edge order.
  2. Target-passing existence. Determine whether every target graph lies on a favourable full order beginning from one of its spanning trees.
  3. Independent exact reconstruction. Reimplement the five-vertex census in SageMath, PARI/GP, or another materially separate stack.
  4. Formalization. Formalize the witness, four-vertex minimality proof, and finite orbit classification in a proof assistant.
  5. Specialist priority audit. Search discipline-specific indexes and differently phrased graph-energy literature for the exact valley and nine-orbit classification.

What is in the evidence package

The immutable release includes the canonical PDF and LaTeX, abridged Markdown, proof and claim maps, exact verifiers, generated census record, mutation tests, source and literature receipts, internal and supplied-review response records, research metrics, licences, replay receipt, and SHA-256 manifest. The version DOI is the citation target; any correction should be a versioned successor, not a silent edit.

Media

The audio briefing is provided in the header above. Download the MP3 briefing · read the transcript.

Open directions for follow-up research

Also available in machine-readable form for research agents and follow-up projects.

  1. Prove or refute that every connected starting graph has at least one peak-unimodal full missing-edge ordering.
  2. Determine whether every target graph lies on a peak-unimodal full ordering beginning from one of its spanning trees.
  3. Independently reimplement the exact five-vertex census and orbit classification in a materially separate stack.
  4. Formalize the witness, four-vertex proof, exhaustive enumeration bridge, and nine-orbit classification.
  5. Obtain an unaffiliated spectral-graph-theory source, proof, and priority assessment.

Research process, metrics and reusable methods

Prospective process metadata under the Evidence Press operating model and research-metrics policy. It records the intended handoff, measured scope and claim boundary; it is not evidence that the method accelerated this work.

Work ID
ep-work:negative-square-energy-five-vertex-valley
Attempt and metric receipts
  • ep-attempt:negative-square-energy-five-vertex-valley-assurance-publication — published / positive

    Measurement scope
    assurance-through-publication — From prospective registration before actioning the supplied Minor Revision report through terminal public readback or a preserved stop. The earlier source search, theorem discovery, exact census, prepare-only review and package construction are excluded and remain recorded in the predecessor package metrics.
    Frozen target
    Action every required review item, confirm the repaired exact bytes, publish synchronized immutable GitHub and Zenodo assets, and complete the two-cycle guarded Evidence Press release without exceeding the universal prescribed-order claim boundary.
    Fermi active-time forecast
    110 minutes; plausible interval 70–180; expected unattended wait 60. Reference class: Minor review repair through full candidate publication (n=1) — The latest comparable full assurance-through-publication attempt completed in 95 active minutes; this candidate has a smaller scientific repair but retains immutable identity, media and two-cycle deployment work..
    • quantifier, favourable-order and assurance repair plus confirmation: 1 × 20/30/50 minutes (low/central/high) — One five-page exact note, one supplied Minor Revision report and a bounded exact favourable-order extension.
    • public research repository, CI, immutable release and Zenodo identity: 1 × 15/25/40 minutes (low/central/high) — One compact anonymous candidate with standard licences and three principal assets.
    • Evidence Press page, operating records, art, audio and thumbnail: 1 × 20/30/45 minutes (low/central/high) — One exact graph-theory release using established reader-first and deterministic media tooling.
    • A/B and C/D seals, CI, guarded deployments and canonical readback: 1 × 15/25/45 minutes (low/central/high) — One new slug requiring two bounded merge and deployment cycles.
    Tractability forecast
    Within 180 active minutes: positive signal 0.95; target closure 0.8. Stop rule: Stop on a fatal proof, semantic, novelty, licence, authentication, preservation, CI, accessibility or exact-readback failure. At 110 active agent minutes consolidate to load-bearing gates and report variance; at 180 active minutes pause rather than weaken a gate unless the user explicitly authorises continuation after seeing the exact blocker.
    Observed clocks
    55 active-agent; unknown active-human; 1 substantive-compute; 6 unattended-wait; 0 blocked; 0 rework minutes. Calendar elapsed: 61 minutes.
    Research search
    Cycles: 0 positive, 0 negative, 0 inconclusive. Falsification gates: 4. Candidate architectures: 0 tested, 0 rejected.
    Agent and review load
    1 agent runs; maximum parallelism 1; 1 model turns; 844070 deduplicated model tokens; 1 substantive review rounds; P0/P1 findings 0/0; pre-publication claim corrections 4.
    Result and calibration
    target-closed — The supplied Minor Revision was fully actioned, the repaired universal-versus-existential claim boundary and favourable-order witness passed exact confirmation and four mutation controls, and byte-identical immutable GitHub and Zenodo assets reached canonical Evidence Press publication with provenance-bound media, composite CI, accessibility, preservation, protocol and browser readback. The fork-aware goal counter recorded 844,070 model tokens at first publication from a goal boundary three minutes earlier than site-ledger registration. The result remains an anonymous unrefereed candidate with no external-assurance or impact promotion. Positive signal: true; target reached: true. Active-time error -55 minutes; actual/forecast 0.5; inside interval: false. Brier score: positive signal 0.0025; target closure 0.04. Variance: The compact repaired candidate reused established exact-package, GitHub, Zenodo, media, composite-seal and deployment tooling; authentication recovery and every external gate completed inside the low end of the first prospectively measured class interval despite one caught audio-index omission.
    Missing telemetry
    activeHumanMinutes — No instrument captured human direction or review time at the prospective attempt boundary.; uncachedInputTokens — The runtime does not expose an uncached-input counter.
    Measurement corrections
    • provisional publication rework and terminal outcome scope — Retain zero in both immutable structured rework fields and record the later two-minute closeout observation in this append-only correction receipt. The correction explains the scope difference; no research claim, assurance state, milestone time or forecast value changes. Reason: The first canonical deployment published the prospective measurement record with zero rework minutes before the terminal outcome was assembled. The terminal closeout subsequently measured two rework minutes, and replacing the already-public provisional field would erase that publication-time observation.
Prospective work ledger · metrics policy
Intended aims
science
Artifact roles
research-output, evidence-assessment, method-demonstration, communication
Decision object
counterexample — An exact five-vertex ordered strict valley that refutes universal prescribed-order peak-unimodality, plus structural vertex-minimality, a complete five-vertex classification, and a favourable-order boundary witness. Scope: The universal formulation U, exact five-vertex witness, structural minimality through four vertices, exhaustive 840-count and nine-orbit classification, and one favourable order for the same tree; not E_start, E_target, historical priority, or external validation.
Reusable methods
Counterexample- and proxy-first analysis (counterexample-proxy-first); Certificate-first, proof-carrying research (certificate-first); Structural compression (structural-compression); Adversarial scientific controls (adversarial-controls); Assurance as a vector (assurance-vector); Agent-readable research objects (agent-readable-research-object) · registry
Targeted clocks
discovery, assurance, publication
Semantic bridge
explicit — The package formalizes universal and two existential order statements, embeds the valley at positive indices, and supplies both a bad and favourable order from the same tree so the resolved and open formulations are mechanically and mathematically distinct. Remaining risks: The AIMPL source does not print an explicit order quantifier.; The exhaustive classification remains producer-side computation rather than a standalone proof object.; The supplied review's identity and independent status were not authenticated.; The targeted novelty search may miss differently phrased, unindexed, or informal prior work..
Human judgement gates
  • Keep U, E_start, and E_target distinct and state that only U is refuted.
  • Check the rational root-isolation argument and four-vertex case split as mathematics rather than inferring truth from replay.
  • Keep producer exact census replay separate from unaffiliated reproduction and proof-assistant formalization.
  • Keep found novelty evidence separate from first, priority, solved-problem, or field-acceptance language.
Next assurance action
Obtain an authenticated unaffiliated exact reconstruction and spectral-graph-theory literature assessment, then investigate E_start and E_target without promoting the present universal-only claim ceiling. Claim ceiling: An anonymous unrefereed counterexample to U with exact producer replay, structural minimality, exhaustive five-vertex classification, a favourable-order boundary witness, public immutable assets, and internal PASS_WITH_NOTES; not a resolution of E_start or E_target, historical priority, unaffiliated validation, formal verification, external specialist review, or editorial peer review.
Aim-scoped impact evidence
  • science: NO_IMPACT_EVIDENCE — Faster or more reliable resolution and assurance of spectral graph theory open problems in AI-assisted counterexample search, exact enumeration, proof compression, source audit, review repair, and guarded candidate publication. Design: none; comparator: No matched conventional research, theorem-review, or publication workflow was registered.; estimand: No effect on discovery time, active human effort, compute, correction rate, proof quality, independent-assurance time, uptake, citation, or field outcomes was estimated.. No real-world effect evidence is asserted.
Parent handoffs
  • depends-on-claim https://aimath.org/problemlists/ — inherited claim: AIMPL Problem 1.4 item 2 asks for negative square energy to be unimodal along successive additions of the listed missing edges.; inherited ceiling: The source record fixes the question and attribution but leaves the order quantifier unstated and does not validate this candidate's witness, proof, classification, novelty, or priority.

Verification status

Anonymous, unrefereed spectral-graph-theory candidate at internal PASS_WITH_NOTES. The witness and four-vertex minimality have short hand proofs; the 840-count and nine-orbit classification rely on exhaustive producer-side exact computation. A supplied review reports a separate Linux replay and numerical reimplementation, but reviewer identity and supporting artifacts were not authenticated, so independent assurance remains not assessed. The source order quantifier is unstated: the release refutes the universal or arbitrary prescribed-order formulation only and leaves both favourable-order existential formulations open.

Cite

Anonymous. (2026). A Minimal Strict Valley in Negative Square Energy under Edge Addition (Version 0.2.0-candidate) [Anonymous unrefereed candidate and evidence package]. Evidence Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22169169
BibTeX
@misc{negativesquareenergyfivevertexvalley2026,
  title        = {A Minimal Strict Valley in Negative Square Energy under Edge Addition},
  author       = {Anonymous},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22169169},
  url          = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22169169},
  version      = {0.2.0-candidate},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  note         = {Unrefereed; internally replayed evidence package. Press page: https://evidencepress.org/releases/negative-square-energy-five-vertex-valley/}
}

Also: cite.bib · paper.json · this page as Markdown