E Evidence Press

Press release · 21 September 2026 · version 0.1.0-candidate

Superexponential strict-improvement distances in median graphs

Integer separation forces very long strictly improving moves, even in median graphs.

Listen to this briefingNarrated summary · OpenAI API synthetic voice (fable) · MP3 · download

Summary

A point in a network can have no strictly better center nearby and still fail to be a center. This candidate constructs median graphs where the first strict improvement is extremely far away relative to cube dimension. It answers a proposed dimension-linear locality question negatively.

Summary for specialists

For every odd $d\ge3$, an explicit finite median graph of cube dimension $d$ has a noncentral origin with exact first strict eccentricity improvement distance $2F_d-1$. A transfer proposition realizes the minimum integer $\ell_1$ separation norm of any strictly feasible sign system as that graph distance. Alon–Vũ's threshold-weight theorem then gives the lower bound $d^{d/2}2^{-(2+o(1))d}$ for every sufficiently large $d$.

For binary corner profiles on integer grids, a determinant argument supplies an upper bound $d^{d/2+1}$. Consequently the extremal logarithm is $(1/2+o(1))d\log_2d$. That upper bound is restricted to the corner-profile model.

Technical account

In the integer box $[-N,N]^d$, the distance from $x$ to corner $Ns$ is $dN-s\cdot x$. Thus improving the maximum distance to selected corners requires every corresponding dot product to be positive. Integer threshold representations can force the first feasible vector to have very large norm.

An alternating AND/OR function yields an exact Fibonacci example with a self-contained proof. Long pendant paths at selected corners make their far endpoints determine ordinary eccentricity; the paths preserve the median property and cube dimension. The stronger all-dimensions estimate uses established work of Alon and Vũ. The threshold-weight theorem itself is not a new result of this release.

The cover is a schematic grid-and-pendant-path composition, not a full drawing of a high-dimensional example or numerical evidence.

Evidence, assurance and limitations

The written proofs establish the proposed mathematical result. The exact checker audits eight finite Boolean instances, excludes closer improving grid vertices in dimensions three and five, and checks every distinct triple in the complete 51-vertex example. Normal and optimized Python runs include three negative controls.

This remains an unrefereed candidate. Producer replay and internal model-mediated editorial reports do not establish unaffiliated reproduction, journal peer review, formal verification or historical priority. A supplied separate checker was rerun locally, but its authorship and unaffiliated status are unverified.

Strict decrease matters: in the smallest example an equal-value move of length two permits a later improvement of length one. No running-time lower bound for arbitrary algorithms follows. Cube dimension is not graph order, and the constructed graphs can be large.

Who should care, and why

AudiencePotential useRequired caution
Graph theoristsTest radius-unimodality conjectures against explicit median graphsGeneral median-graph upper bounds remain open here
Threshold theoristsTranslate integer-weight lower bounds into graph localityThe cited weight theorems are prior work
Algorithm researchersIdentify limits of immediate-descent certificatesPlateau moves and global algorithms remain available

Why the problem matters

A local optimality test is useful only when its inspection radius is justified. These examples show that the proposed radius cannot scale linearly with cube dimension, or even as any fixed-base exponential. The result clarifies what a local certificate can promise; it does not undermine established global eccentricity algorithms.

How to inspect or reproduce the recorded checks

Download and extract the versioned evidence archive. With standard-library Python, run:

python3 verify.py --output replay.json
python3 -O verify.py --output replay-optimized.json

Compare both outputs with verification.json, then check MANIFEST.sha256. Read Sections 2–4 for the universal proofs, and the primary Alon–Vũ source for the external theorem. Finite replay is not a substitute for those arguments.

The most valuable next projects

Determine upper bounds for all median graphs, study plateau-permitting movement, and reduce graph order while retaining large strict-improvement distances. An unaffiliated proof review and separate reimplementation would strengthen assurance without changing the current status retrospectively.

What is in the evidence package

The package includes PDF, Markdown and TeX manuscripts; the exact verifier and expected output; claim and source records; internal editorial reports; the response to the supplied review; licence boundaries; and a complete file manifest. Original prose and data use CC0, and original code uses MIT. Cited papers and supplied third-party review files are linked or described, not relicensed or redistributed.

Media

The audio briefing is provided in the header above. Download the MP3 briefing.

Open directions for follow-up research

Also available in machine-readable form for research agents and follow-up projects.

  1. Determine upper locality bounds for ordinary eccentricity on all finite median graphs.
  2. Understand what plateau moves permit and their dependence on dimension.
  3. Find smaller graphs realizing large strict-improvement distances.

Research process, metrics and reusable methods

Prospective process metadata under the Evidence Press operating model and research-metrics policy. It records the intended handoff, measured scope and claim boundary; it is not evidence that the method accelerated this work.

Work ID
ep-work:median-radius-obstructions
Attempt and metric receipts
  • ep-attempt:median-radius-obstructions-publication — published / positive

    Measurement scope
    publication-only — Remaining publication only from registration. Discovery, supplied review, source comparison, manuscript revisions and initial checker runs precede registration and are left-censored; no discovery clock is reconstructed.
    Frozen target
    Internal editorial approval, immutable GitHub and Zenodo candidate assets, and complete Evidence Press page/media/canonical readback.
    Fermi active-time forecast
    150 minutes; plausible interval 90–240; expected unattended wait 20. Reference class: Reviewed exact mathematics release (n=0) — Procedural prior; no measured speed comparison..
    • Source repairs and internal editorial gate: 1 × 30/50/80 minutes (low/central/high) — Established publication route; not an empirical speed comparison.
    • Immutable archives and communication assets: 1 × 30/50/80 minutes (low/central/high) — Established publication route; not an empirical speed comparison.
    • Composite CI and two deployment cycles: 1 × 30/50/80 minutes (low/central/high) — Established publication route; not an empirical speed comparison.
    Tractability forecast
    Within 240 active minutes: positive signal 0.95; target closure 0.85. Stop rule: Timing is telemetry, not a cap; continue unless integrity or provider access blocks publication.
    Observed clocks
    4 active-agent; unknown active-human; unknown substantive-compute; 1 unattended-wait; 0 blocked; 0 rework minutes. Calendar elapsed: 21 minutes.
    Research search
    Cycles: 0 positive, 0 negative, 0 inconclusive. Falsification gates: 3. Candidate architectures: 1 tested, 0 rejected.
    Agent and review load
    6 agent runs; maximum parallelism 4; 6 model turns; unknown deduplicated model tokens; 1 substantive review rounds; P0/P1 findings 0/0; pre-publication claim corrections 0.
    Result and calibration
    target-closed — Supplied review actioned; five internal roles accepted; immutable GitHub and Zenodo asset parity and first canonical website/media readback passed. Final preservation-ledger deployment follows. Earlier work remains left-censored. Positive signal: true; target reached: true. Active-time error -146 minutes; actual/forecast 0.0267; inside interval: false. Brier score: positive signal 0.0025; target closure 0.0225. Variance: Active minutes are an instrumented lower bound for the remaining merge/deploy/readback segment only, excluding explicitly timed unattended waits. Earlier publication work was not instrumented and is excluded; this is not total route effort and is not directly comparable with the full remaining-publication forecast. Model turns are a lower bound of six distinct root/reviewer invocations; individual sampling turns are unavailable. Rework zero means no separately timed rework segment in this stopwatch, not no prior repairs. No discovery-time, acceleration or impact inference.
    Missing telemetry
    activeHumanMinutes — Human effort not instrumented.; computeMinutes — No separately instrumented substantive-compute total; ordinary validation excluded.; deduplicatedModelTokens — Supported fork-aware counter unavailable.; uncachedInputTokens — Runtime cache/token accounting unavailable.
    Measurement corrections
    • measurement.reworkMinutes -> metrics.outcome.reworkMinutes — Preserve intake null; retain scoped lower-bound terminal value and variance explanation. Reason: The intake retains unknown total rework. Terminal zero refers only to no separately timed rework interval in the instrumented final segment, not absence of earlier packaging repairs.
Prospective work ledger · metrics policy
Intended aims
science
Artifact roles
research-output, evidence-assessment, communication
Decision object
counterexample — Exact sign-separation transfer and strict-improvement obstruction family. Scope: Dimension-linear radius unimodality question; corner-profile upper bound is restricted.
Reusable methods
Certificate-first, proof-carrying research (certificate-first); Adversarial scientific controls (adversarial-controls); Assurance as a vector (assurance-vector); Agent-readable research objects (agent-readable-research-object) · registry
Targeted clocks
assurance, publication
Semantic bridge
explicit — Corner distances are dN minus signed dot products; strict improvement is equivalent to integer strict separation. Pendant paths preserve cube dimension. Remaining risks: Written proof and external threshold theorem require mathematical judgment.; Plateau-permitting algorithms are outside the obstruction.; Priority remains unestablished..
Human judgement gates
  • Assess the source-to-claim correspondence and written proof.
  • Preserve rights, status and priority boundaries.
  • Publication is authorised; external review is a separate dimension.
Next assurance action
Inspect and independently reproduce the bounded result; explore extensions separately. External review is not a publication prerequisite. Claim ceiling: Unrefereed candidate. No authenticated external peer review, formal verification, historical priority, or algorithmic running-time lower bound is established.
Aim-scoped impact evidence
  • science: NO_IMPACT_EVIDENCE — Inspectable locality counterexample and exact graph transfer in Producer-coordinated mathematical publication. Design: none; comparator: None.; estimand: No acceleration or impact effect estimated.. No real-world effect evidence is asserted.

Verification status

Unrefereed candidate. No authenticated external peer review, formal verification, historical priority, or algorithmic running-time lower bound is established.

Reviews and assessments

Internal five-role editorial assessment

editorial-assessment · 2026-09-21 · recommendation: Accept

All five internal roles recommended acceptance of the same frozen submission. No required repairs; priority, external assurance and general algorithmic lower bounds remain unestablished.

Read the structured review

Cite

Anonymous. (2026). Superexponential strict-improvement distances in median graphs (Version 0.1.0-candidate) [Unrefereed candidate]. Evidence Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22878369
BibTeX
@misc{medianradiusobstructions2026,
  title        = {Superexponential strict-improvement distances in median graphs},
  author       = {Anonymous},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.22878369},
  url          = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22878369},
  version      = {0.1.0-candidate},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  note         = {Unrefereed; internally replayed evidence package. Press page: https://evidencepress.org/releases/median-radius-obstructions/}
}

Also: cite.bib · paper.json · this page as Markdown