{
  "schemaVersion": "1.6",
  "slug": "gaussian-radon-one-point-extension",
  "title": "A one-point extension of Gaussian Radon log-concavity",
  "shortTitle": "One more point, two useful deletions",
  "url": "https://evidencepress.org/releases/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension/",
  "oneLine": "A two-deletion identity extends a known Gaussian convex-hull intersection theorem from d+2 to d+3 points, with an explicit log-concavity margin.",
  "abstract": "Split independent points from one nonsingular Gaussian law into two fixed labelled groups. For d+3 points in dimension d, the probability that their convex hulls intersect is log-concave in group size. A deterministic identity counts exactly two deletions preserving a feasible split and reduces the result to the known d+2-point Gaussian theorem. The paper gives an explicit margin, exact slack and local equality criteria, and a conditional transfer to exchangeable laws. General arrangement identities and qualitative ultra-log-concavity convolution are inherited; cases with at least d+4 points remain unresolved here.",
  "datePublished": "2026-11-06",
  "dateModified": "2026-11-06",
  "version": "0.1.0-candidate",
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.23997793",
  "doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23997793",
  "conceptDoi": null,
  "pdfUrl": "https://github.com/ipitchford/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension/releases/download/v0.1.0-candidate/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension-v0.1.0-candidate.pdf",
  "altPdfUrl": null,
  "altPdfLabel": null,
  "zenodoUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/23997793",
  "repoUrl": "https://github.com/ipitchford/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension",
  "releaseUrl": "https://github.com/ipitchford/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension/releases/tag/v0.1.0-candidate",
  "markdownUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/releases/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension/index.md",
  "bibtexUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/releases/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension/cite.bib",
  "audioUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/audio/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension.mp3",
  "imageUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/og/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension.png?v=959b99060f",
  "coverArtUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/art/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension.svg?v=4b3ed6d374",
  "media": [
    {
      "type": "audio",
      "url": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/audio/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension.mp3",
      "name": "Plain-English audio briefing",
      "description": "Communication aid; not additional research evidence.",
      "transcriptUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/audio/gaussian-radon-one-point-extension.txt"
    }
  ],
  "authors": [
    "Anonymous"
  ],
  "license": "CC0-1.0",
  "status": "unrefereed-candidate",
  "verification": {
    "peerReviewed": false,
    "independentlyReproduced": false,
    "formallyVerified": false,
    "internallyReplayed": false,
    "detail": "Unrefereed AI-assisted mathematical candidate. Internal checking is not external peer review, unaffiliated reproduction or formal verification; bounded source comparison does not guarantee priority."
  },
  "assurance": [
    {
      "dimension": "availability",
      "label": "Availability and archiving",
      "question": "Is the evidence package publicly retrievable from an archive under a persistent identifier?",
      "state": "passed",
      "evidenceUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/23997793",
      "note": "Published GitHub and Zenodo archives; all three assets match the frozen local SHA-256 manifest by full public download. This establishes availability and byte parity, not proof correctness."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "internalReplay",
      "label": "Internal replay",
      "question": "Does the producer’s own pipeline reproduce the stated result from the archived package?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "Pure written mathematical proof with an analytic order-counting example. No numerical scientific replay is applicable; passed packaging gates are not proof verification."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "independentRerun",
      "label": "Independent rerun",
      "question": "Has someone else run the supplied implementation and obtained the stated result?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No unaffiliated rerun established."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "independentReimplementation",
      "label": "Independent reimplementation",
      "question": "Has someone else reached the result from an independent implementation?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No unaffiliated independent reimplementation established."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "formalVerification",
      "label": "Formal verification",
      "question": "Is a formalised statement machine-checked, and over which trusted base?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No proof-assistant verification claimed."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "specialistReview",
      "label": "Specialist review",
      "question": "Has a domain specialist assessed the argument?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "Internal AI-assisted checking is not external specialist review."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "editorialPeerReview",
      "label": "Editorial peer review",
      "question": "Has a journal or venue run peer review to a decision?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No external editorial peer review established."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "dataEnvironmentReproducibility",
      "label": "Data and environment reproducibility",
      "question": "Are data and computational environment pinned well enough to rebuild?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "Manuscript source and source-audit records are supplied. No experimental dataset or numerical replay environment is required by this proof."
    }
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "aiGenerated": true,
    "aiAssisted": true,
    "generatedBy": [
      "AI-assisted mathematical development and revision",
      "Internal AI-assisted source and proof checking",
      "Codex publication preparation"
    ],
    "humanRole": "Publication authority only; no human mathematical contribution inferred.",
    "reviewStatus": "Internal AI-assisted review is not unaffiliated peer review."
  },
  "attributionBoundary": null,
  "problem": null,
  "orderedProductAverage": null,
  "corrections": [],
  "publicCorrections": [],
  "publicCorrectionIndexes": null,
  "pageStructureVersion": "2.0",
  "pageStructureVariant": "canonical-theorem",
  "pageStructureWaivers": [],
  "recordMaturity": "current",
  "metadataProvenance": "Prepared from the revised manuscript and bibliography on 6 November 2026. All three frozen archive assets verified by full public downloads from GitHub and Zenodo against local SHA-256; availability is not mathematical validation.",
  "grandfatheredAtSchemaVersion": null,
  "keywords": [
    "Radon partition",
    "Gaussian random polytope",
    "log-concavity",
    "deletion identity",
    "ultra-log-concavity"
  ],
  "keyResults": [
    "For d+3 independent points from one nonsingular Gaussian law, fixed labelled convex-hull intersection probabilities are log-concave in group size.",
    "Exactly two deletions preserve any feasible split in affine general position, yielding 2q_k=k a_(k−1)+(n−k)a_k.",
    "An explicit margin and exact local slack refine the inherited qualitative convolution principle.",
    "Transfer to exchangeable laws requires a positive-interior log-concave common deletion marginal.",
    "The higher-nullity cases n≥d+4 and strictness at every Gaussian interior index remain unresolved here."
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "evidencePackage": "Conventional written proof and an exact four-point line example derived by order counting. Five packaging gates passed; no numerical scientific replay or formal verification is claimed.",
  "openProblems": [],
  "mathObjects": [],
  "relatedWorks": [
    {
      "citation": "Chan, Kalai, Narayanan, Ter-Saakov and White (2026). Unimodality for Radon Partitions of Random Vectors. Discrete & Computational Geometry. The inherited d+2 Gaussian base.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-026-00870-6",
      "doi": "10.1007/s00454-026-00870-6"
    },
    {
      "citation": "White (2025). Radon Partitions of Random Gaussian Polytopes. arXiv:2507.05449v1.",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05449v1",
      "doi": "10.48550/arXiv.2507.05449"
    },
    {
      "citation": "Streltsova and Wagner (2025). Levels in Arrangements: Linear Relations, the g-Matrix, and Applications to Crossing Numbers. SoCG 2025, 75:1–75:18.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.75",
      "doi": "10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.75"
    },
    {
      "citation": "Liggett (1997). Ultra Logconcave Sequences and Negative Dependence. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 79, 315–325.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1006/jcta.1997.2790",
      "doi": "10.1006/jcta.1997.2790"
    },
    {
      "citation": "Gurvits (2008). A short, based on the mixed volume, proof of Liggett's theorem on the convolution of ultra-logconcave sequences. arXiv:0804.1181, Theorem 1.1.",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.1181",
      "doi": "10.48550/arXiv.0804.1181"
    }
  ],
  "claimAssurance": null,
  "operatingModel": {
    "version": "1.0",
    "workId": "ep-work:gaussian-radon-one-point-extension",
    "attemptIds": [
      "ep-attempt:gaussian-radon-one-point-extension-publication"
    ],
    "aims": [
      "science"
    ],
    "artifactRoles": [
      "research-output"
    ],
    "lineageId": null,
    "accelerationPrimitives": [
      "structural-compression",
      "assurance-vector",
      "agent-readable-research-object"
    ],
    "decisionObject": {
      "type": "bound",
      "description": "A one-point Gaussian Radon log-concavity extension with a quantitative local margin.",
      "scope": "n=d+3 independent identically distributed nonsingular Gaussian points; conditional exchangeable transfer retains its deletion-marginal premise."
    },
    "bottleneckTargeted": [
      "assurance",
      "publication"
    ],
    "semanticBridge": {
      "state": "explicit",
      "description": "A two-dimensional affine-dependence sign cone yields a two-deletion count, whose expectation transfers the known smaller-sample inequality.",
      "remainingRisks": [
        "The known Gaussian base theorem remains load-bearing.",
        "The normalized random-side law differs from fixed labelled split probabilities.",
        "Bounded novelty assessment is not exhaustive priority; larger nullity remains open."
      ]
    },
    "humanJudgmentGates": [
      "Publication authority is not scientific endorsement.",
      "External specialist validation remains open."
    ],
    "parentLinks": [],
    "assuranceTarget": {
      "dimensions": [
        "specialistReview",
        "independentRerun",
        "priorityAssessment"
      ],
      "nextAction": "External source-led review of the deletion identity, normalization, quantitative slack and inherited Gaussian base.",
      "claimCeiling": "Written source-dependent proof; no numerical scientific replay, external validation, formal verification or absolute originality guarantee."
    },
    "impactClaims": [
      {
        "id": "gaussian-radon-one-point-extension-no-impact",
        "aim": "science",
        "outcome": "Potential reuse of a deletion identity in random convex geometry.",
        "setting": "Random polytopes and probabilistic combinatorics",
        "status": "NO_IMPACT_EVIDENCE",
        "designClass": "none",
        "comparator": "No matched research-workflow comparison.",
        "estimand": "No acceleration or downstream impact effect estimated.",
        "evidenceRefs": [],
        "registeredDesignRef": null,
        "independentAssessment": null
      }
    ]
  },
  "researchMetrics": {
    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
    "policyUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/api/research-metrics-policy.json",
    "outcomePolicyUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/api/v2/research-metrics-policy.json",
    "workLedgerUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/api/work-ledger.json",
    "claimCeiling": "These records describe scoped workflow inputs and outcomes. They support calibration and reference-class construction, but do not by themselves establish research acceleration, theorem correctness, novelty, independent assurance or impact.",
    "attempts": [
      {
        "attemptId": "ep-attempt:gaussian-radon-one-point-extension-publication",
        "status": "active",
        "resultClass": "pending",
        "metrics": {
          "schemaVersion": "1.0",
          "measurementScope": "publication-only",
          "scopeBoundary": "Only work remaining at forecast registration: provider completion, site/media integration and QA, required CI, deployment, readback and closeout. Completed research, review and earlier packaging are excluded and unmeasured.",
          "forecast": {
            "frozenAt": "2026-11-06T06:21:36.725Z",
            "procedureClass": "full-candidate-publication",
            "targetOutcome": "Qualified Gaussian archive and website publication preserving inherited-result attribution and pure-written-proof assurance.",
            "expectedActiveMinutes": 65,
            "plausibleLowMinutes": 30,
            "plausibleHighMinutes": 120,
            "expectedUnattendedWaitMinutes": 20,
            "referenceClass": {
              "label": "Remaining candidate publication from current state",
              "sampleSize": 0,
              "basis": "Current prospective planning estimate supplied by coordinating agent; not measured historical duration."
            },
            "fermiComponents": [
              {
                "component": "Remaining archive/provider completion",
                "count": 1,
                "lowMinutesPerUnit": 5,
                "centralMinutesPerUnit": 15,
                "highMinutesPerUnit": 30,
                "basis": "Current remaining provider work only."
              },
              {
                "component": "Remaining site/media integration and QA",
                "count": 1,
                "lowMinutesPerUnit": 10,
                "centralMinutesPerUnit": 25,
                "highMinutesPerUnit": 45,
                "basis": "Current uncompleted integration and presentation checks only."
              },
              {
                "component": "Required CI, deployment, readback and closeout",
                "count": 1,
                "lowMinutesPerUnit": 15,
                "centralMinutesPerUnit": 25,
                "highMinutesPerUnit": 45,
                "basis": "Remaining guarded publication gates; historical research excluded."
              }
            ],
            "probabilityPositiveSignal": 0.8,
            "probabilityTargetClosure": 0.8,
            "probabilityHorizonMinutes": 240,
            "assumptions": [
              "Configured providers remain available; estimates and probabilities are planning judgments, not empirical calibration."
            ],
            "reforecastTriggers": [
              "Provider outage or new integrity defect changes remaining scope."
            ],
            "stopRule": "Preserve every integrity and assurance gate even if forecast exceeded."
          },
          "outcome": null
        },
        "missingnessReason": null
      }
    ]
  }
}