{
  "schemaVersion": "1.6",
  "slug": "entropy-continuity-stability",
  "title": "Sharp entropy continuity and stability under trace and operator constraints",
  "shortTitle": "Exact distances are not error budgets",
  "url": "https://evidencepress.org/releases/entropy-continuity-stability/",
  "oneLine": "Two-distance entropy bounds gain equality criteria, a finite error-budget calculation and quantitative stability around one common optimal pair.",
  "abstract": "For finite-dimensional quantum states, exact trace and operator distances pose a different optimization problem from upper bounds on those distances. Building on published entropy inequalities and capped-spectrum optimization, this candidate characterizes equality, evaluates the upper-cap modulus by endpoints and quadratic roots, and proves that near-extremizers at fixed positive trace distance are close to one common extremal pair. The square-root deficit exponent is sharp, but the coefficient is not claimed optimal and deteriorates as trace distance tends to zero.",
  "datePublished": "2026-11-06",
  "dateModified": "2026-11-06",
  "version": "0.1.0-candidate",
  "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.23997749",
  "doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23997749",
  "conceptDoi": null,
  "pdfUrl": "https://github.com/ipitchford/entropy-continuity-stability/releases/download/v0.1.0-candidate/entropy-continuity-stability-v0.1.0-candidate.pdf",
  "altPdfUrl": null,
  "altPdfLabel": null,
  "zenodoUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/23997749",
  "repoUrl": "https://github.com/ipitchford/entropy-continuity-stability",
  "releaseUrl": "https://github.com/ipitchford/entropy-continuity-stability/releases/tag/v0.1.0-candidate",
  "markdownUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/releases/entropy-continuity-stability/index.md",
  "bibtexUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/releases/entropy-continuity-stability/cite.bib",
  "audioUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/audio/entropy-continuity-stability.mp3",
  "imageUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/og/entropy-continuity-stability.png?v=7a298856ea",
  "coverArtUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/art/entropy-continuity-stability.svg?v=3960b37909",
  "media": [
    {
      "type": "audio",
      "url": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/audio/entropy-continuity-stability.mp3",
      "name": "Plain-English audio briefing",
      "description": "Communication aid; not additional research evidence.",
      "transcriptUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/assets/audio/entropy-continuity-stability.txt"
    }
  ],
  "authors": [
    "Anonymous"
  ],
  "license": "CC0-1.0",
  "status": "unrefereed-candidate",
  "verification": {
    "peerReviewed": false,
    "independentlyReproduced": false,
    "formallyVerified": false,
    "internallyReplayed": true,
    "detail": "Unrefereed AI-assisted mathematical candidate. Internal checking is not external peer review, unaffiliated reproduction or formal verification; bounded source comparison does not guarantee priority."
  },
  "assurance": [
    {
      "dimension": "availability",
      "label": "Availability and archiving",
      "question": "Is the evidence package publicly retrievable from an archive under a persistent identifier?",
      "state": "passed",
      "evidenceUrl": "https://zenodo.org/records/23997749",
      "note": "All three frozen assets are publicly available from GitHub and Zenodo with matching full-download hashes; archive-parity receipt retained."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "internalReplay",
      "label": "Internal replay",
      "question": "Does the producer’s own pipeline reproduce the stated result from the archived package?",
      "state": "passed",
      "note": "Six frozen-package gates passed in the retained research receipt, including clean normal and optimized producer-side replay with guard tests. Finite examples and floating diagnostics do not prove the universal theorems."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "independentRerun",
      "label": "Independent rerun",
      "question": "Has someone else run the supplied implementation and obtained the stated result?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No unaffiliated rerun established."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "independentReimplementation",
      "label": "Independent reimplementation",
      "question": "Has someone else reached the result from an independent implementation?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No unaffiliated independent reimplementation established."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "formalVerification",
      "label": "Formal verification",
      "question": "Is a formalised statement machine-checked, and over which trusted base?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No proof-assistant verification claimed."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "specialistReview",
      "label": "Specialist review",
      "question": "Has a domain specialist assessed the argument?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "Internal AI-assisted checking is not external specialist review."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "editorialPeerReview",
      "label": "Editorial peer review",
      "question": "Has a journal or venue run peer review to a decision?",
      "state": "not-assessed",
      "note": "No external editorial peer review established."
    },
    {
      "dimension": "dataEnvironmentReproducibility",
      "label": "Data and environment reproducibility",
      "question": "Are data and computational environment pinned well enough to rebuild?",
      "state": "passed",
      "note": "The frozen source package, pinned environment and checkers passed clean producer-side normal and optimized replay. No unaffiliated reproduction or formal verification is claimed."
    }
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "aiGenerated": true,
    "aiAssisted": true,
    "generatedBy": [
      "AI-assisted mathematical development and revision",
      "Internal AI-assisted source and proof checking",
      "Codex publication preparation"
    ],
    "humanRole": "Publication authority only; no human mathematical contribution inferred.",
    "reviewStatus": "Internal AI-assisted review is not unaffiliated peer review."
  },
  "attributionBoundary": null,
  "problem": null,
  "orderedProductAverage": null,
  "corrections": [],
  "publicCorrections": [],
  "publicCorrectionIndexes": null,
  "pageStructureVersion": "2.0",
  "pageStructureVariant": "canonical-theorem",
  "pageStructureWaivers": [],
  "recordMaturity": "current",
  "metadataProvenance": "Prepared from the revised manuscript and refs.bib on 6 November 2026. Published GitHub and Zenodo assets verified against the frozen local payload by full public downloads of all three files.",
  "grandfatheredAtSchemaVersion": null,
  "keywords": [
    "quantum entropy",
    "continuity bound",
    "trace distance",
    "operator norm",
    "stability",
    "equality cases"
  ],
  "keyResults": [
    "All equality cases for the prescribed trace/operator-distance entropy optimum, whose formula and attaining family have published predecessors.",
    "A continuous upper-cap modulus obtained from finitely many endpoints and quadratic-root candidates; direct substitution of caps into the exact-distance formula can underestimate the entropy change.",
    "At fixed positive trace distance, both states lie within a square-root deficit bound of one common extremal pair, without a rank-gap assumption.",
    "The square-root exponent is sharp; no optimal coefficient or uniform stability as trace distance vanishes is claimed.",
    "Restricted common-marginal conditional-entropy attainment and fixed-difference consequences retain their stated dimensional assumptions."
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "evidencePackage": "Written proofs, finite arithmetic examples, floating-point diagnostics and targeted semantic guard tests. Computations do not establish the universal theorems.",
  "openProblems": [],
  "mathObjects": [],
  "relatedWorks": [
    {
      "citation": "Sason (2013). Entropy Bounds for Discrete Random Variables via Maximal Coupling. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 59, 7118–7131.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2013.2274515",
      "doi": "10.1109/TIT.2013.2274515"
    },
    {
      "citation": "Jabbour and Datta (2024). Tightening continuity bounds for entropies and bounds on quantum capacities. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory 5, 645–658.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAIT.2024.3469929",
      "doi": "10.1109/JSAIT.2024.3469929"
    },
    {
      "citation": "Audenaert, Bergh, Datta, Jabbour, Capel and Gondolf (2025). Continuity bounds for quantum entropies arising from a fundamental entropic inequality. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 71, 7029–7038.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2025.3586478",
      "doi": "10.1109/TIT.2025.3586478"
    },
    {
      "citation": "Audenaert (2007). A sharp continuity estimate for the von Neumann entropy. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40, 8127–8136.",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S18",
      "doi": "10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S18"
    }
  ],
  "claimAssurance": null,
  "operatingModel": {
    "version": "1.0",
    "workId": "ep-work:entropy-continuity-stability",
    "attemptIds": [
      "ep-attempt:entropy-continuity-stability-publication"
    ],
    "aims": [
      "science"
    ],
    "artifactRoles": [
      "research-output"
    ],
    "lineageId": null,
    "accelerationPrimitives": [
      "structural-compression",
      "adversarial-controls",
      "assurance-vector",
      "agent-readable-research-object"
    ],
    "decisionObject": {
      "type": "stability-margin",
      "description": "Finite-dimensional entropy cap evaluation and common-pair near-equality stability.",
      "scope": "Exact trace/operator constraints or upper caps as separately defined; stability conditioned on positive trace distance."
    },
    "bottleneckTargeted": [
      "assurance",
      "publication"
    ],
    "semanticBridge": {
      "state": "explicit",
      "description": "Density-matrix distances determine Jordan spectra; retained entropy deficits control one common extremal pair. Upper caps require optimization over actual distances.",
      "remainingRisks": [
        "Bounded prior-art search does not establish exhaustive priority.",
        "Floating diagnostics are not rigorous numerical enclosures.",
        "Stability is not uniform as trace distance tends to zero; conditional-marginal scope is restricted."
      ]
    },
    "humanJudgmentGates": [
      "Publication authority is not scientific endorsement.",
      "External specialist validation remains open."
    ],
    "parentLinks": [],
    "assuranceTarget": {
      "dimensions": [
        "specialistReview",
        "independentRerun",
        "priorityAssessment"
      ],
      "nextAction": "External source-led checking of equality necessity, finite cap optimization and paired stability, distinct from producer checker replay.",
      "claimCeiling": "Written proof and scoped producer checks; no external validation, formal verification or absolute originality guarantee."
    },
    "impactClaims": [
      {
        "id": "entropy-continuity-stability-no-impact",
        "aim": "science",
        "outcome": "Potential research reuse of entropy error-budget and stability formulas.",
        "setting": "Finite-dimensional quantum information theory",
        "status": "NO_IMPACT_EVIDENCE",
        "designClass": "none",
        "comparator": "No matched research-workflow comparison.",
        "estimand": "No acceleration or downstream impact effect estimated.",
        "evidenceRefs": [],
        "registeredDesignRef": null,
        "independentAssessment": null
      }
    ]
  },
  "researchMetrics": {
    "schemaVersion": "1.0",
    "policyUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/api/research-metrics-policy.json",
    "outcomePolicyUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/api/v2/research-metrics-policy.json",
    "workLedgerUrl": "https://evidencepress.org/api/work-ledger.json",
    "claimCeiling": "These records describe scoped workflow inputs and outcomes. They support calibration and reference-class construction, but do not by themselves establish research acceleration, theorem correctness, novelty, independent assurance or impact.",
    "attempts": [
      {
        "attemptId": "ep-attempt:entropy-continuity-stability-publication",
        "status": "active",
        "resultClass": "pending",
        "metrics": {
          "schemaVersion": "1.0",
          "measurementScope": "publication-only",
          "scopeBoundary": "Only work remaining at forecast registration: provider completion, site/media integration and QA, required CI, deployment, readback and closeout. Completed research, review and earlier packaging are excluded and unmeasured.",
          "forecast": {
            "frozenAt": "2026-11-06T06:16:50.468Z",
            "procedureClass": "full-candidate-publication",
            "targetOutcome": "Qualified archive and website publication preserving entropy scope and assurance limitations.",
            "expectedActiveMinutes": 65,
            "plausibleLowMinutes": 30,
            "plausibleHighMinutes": 120,
            "expectedUnattendedWaitMinutes": 20,
            "referenceClass": {
              "label": "Remaining candidate publication from current state",
              "sampleSize": 0,
              "basis": "Current prospective planning estimate supplied by coordinating agent; not measured historical duration."
            },
            "fermiComponents": [
              {
                "component": "Remaining archive/provider completion",
                "count": 1,
                "lowMinutesPerUnit": 5,
                "centralMinutesPerUnit": 15,
                "highMinutesPerUnit": 30,
                "basis": "Current remaining provider work only."
              },
              {
                "component": "Remaining site/media integration and QA",
                "count": 1,
                "lowMinutesPerUnit": 10,
                "centralMinutesPerUnit": 25,
                "highMinutesPerUnit": 45,
                "basis": "Current uncompleted integration and presentation checks only."
              },
              {
                "component": "Required CI, deployment, readback and closeout",
                "count": 1,
                "lowMinutesPerUnit": 15,
                "centralMinutesPerUnit": 25,
                "highMinutesPerUnit": 45,
                "basis": "Remaining guarded publication gates; historical research excluded."
              }
            ],
            "probabilityPositiveSignal": 0.8,
            "probabilityTargetClosure": 0.8,
            "probabilityHorizonMinutes": 240,
            "assumptions": [
              "Configured providers remain available; estimates and probabilities are planning judgments, not empirical calibration."
            ],
            "reforecastTriggers": [
              "Provider outage or new integrity defect changes remaining scope."
            ],
            "stopRule": "Preserve every integrity and assurance gate even if forecast exceeded."
          },
          "outcome": null
        },
        "missingnessReason": null
      }
    ]
  }
}